Peter Winter — Wedbush Securities — Analyst
Operator
Your next real question is from Erika Najarian of Bank of America.
John M. Turner — President and Ceo
Good Morning, Erika.
Erika Najarian — Bank of America — Analyst
Hi, good early morning. My real question is for Barb, if i really could. The nine quarter loss rate was 3.9% under severely adverse versus the Fed-run test at 6.5% so the last time, Regions went through DFAS. And I also is able to see the historic bias into the CRE bucket but i am wondering, Barb, in the event that you could provide us with a feeling of exactly what the distinction is very in where they believe your C&I loss price would be such a situation versus yours? That is a fairly wide space here. As well as in the absolute most impacted companies that you outlined for all of us is just a cumulative loss price over 2 yrs of around 6% to 7per cent like we saw within the GFC fair? Or you think there is simply, strong sufficient underwriting that will preclude that situation from unfolding?
Barbara Godin — Chief Credit Officer
Well, we constantly understand, firstly, Jennifer Phonetic that individuals’re constantly likely to have enhance losings over these right times during payday loans in Arizona the anxiety. Therefore, we’ll focus on that. And now we additionally understand, and I also feel actually comfortable with this as stating that as proven fact that our underwriting changed, our danger administration is actually strong. The whole business is dedicated to general danger administration. Therefore, we will perform much better than in previous durations. When we view just what our DFAS losses were We’ll simply utilize 2018 possibly being a bellweather, and someone had utilized that in another of their analysis. And also at the time they stated the — that is currently, we’ll see, i’m very sorry, my allowance is $1.665 billion as well as the 2018 DFAS losings at that time had been $3.1 billion. Making sure that’s roughly 55% in a serious environment that is adverse of. And I also genuinely believe that’s very good. I believe it will vary approximately the high 40s and, someplace to the 50s. Therefore, once more generally feeling more comfortable with those numbers. Did we reply to your concern?
Erika Najarian — Bank of America — Analyst
Yes, we guess, we simply wished to explain everything you think the main distinctions have been in regards to exactly just what the Fed views in your profile with regards to the loss experience that is worst as well as trying to puzzle out top of the bound of cumulative losings in those many impacted sectors you’ve outlined in your presentation?
Barbara Godin — Chief Credit Officer
I believe the greatest distinction between everything we have a look at and what the Fed talks about, therefore, also with we are a changed company though we take history into account, the fed models are much more heavily biased toward history, which is the reason I started. We’re perhaps maybe not returning to 2009, ’10, ’11 outlook areas with interested. But those had been our greatest loss records, that are presently nevertheless within the models while the fed model, you may already know, they do not reveal the way they get to your model. Therefore, we need to earn some presumptions so we understand that there is nevertheless a reasonably hefty weighting on that, whereas we now have most likely less of a waiting on that, specially provided every one of our performance since that time has been far better.
John M. Turner — President and Ceo
Erika, simply to include, this will be John. We have invested great deal of the time. I do believe you may already know centered on customer selectivity on danger modified returns, on diversity and balance, on de-risking. In the event that you look across our portfolios, we do not have significant levels. During my view anyhow, in every specific asset classes, we now have a rigorous capital preparation and anxiety evaluating procedure. We are using anxiety as against our profile and making findings about this based on that which we understand today. The supply plus the reserves that people’re presently provisioned, we go through the reserves we are presently keeping mirror our expectation of losings, offered that which we understand, then it is very possible that we could see some additional provisioning if this — the economic environment that exists currently persist. But we do think our loss experience should be better why our projections that are own distinctive from the fed so we’re constantly wanting to figure that away and we nevertheless have I think work to do to better realize. We have been advocating plus the fed is providing an response to giving us more transparency to their presumptions within their work, because we believe that’ll be helpful. If there is a genuine distinction between whatever they think and that which we think, we must know very well what that is, making sure that we can respond to and thus simply purely from the point of view of regulatory relationships, its something which we continue steadily to advocate for.